Red Dead Redemption 2
It ’s been only two years sinceRed Dead Redemption 2released , and though there ’s already talking of a third installment in the enfranchisement potentially being in the plant , Rockstar Gamesmay want to consider waiting a minuscule longer . ARed Dead Redemption 3could seriously hurt the enfranchisement if it ’s not done decently .
Red Dead Redemption 2released in 2018 after an eight - year wait between the sequel and its predecessor . While the original secret plan exploredJohn Marston ’s adventures as he tracked down and kill his former Van Der Linde gang fellow , the second game take after the trial of Arthur Morgan , John , and the rest of the work party before the events of the first deed of conveyance .
Both games have been praised for their impressive graphics and exciting gameplay , makingRed Dead Redemptionthe most successful franchise for Rockstar next to theGrand Theft Autogames . But look at how far they ’ve gone withGTA , in particular how many games have been released since the achiever of the first few instalment , there ’s precedent for Rockstar to turnRed Dead Redemptioninto a trilogy , if not more . However , the keep an eye on rationality may be enough for them to change their minds .
Making Red Dead Redemption A Trilogy Is A Bad Idea
The ways in which Rockstar has extend the life of theGTAfranchise provides reason to consider they ’ll do the same withRDR , but if they constantly repackage or remaster the same titles over and over again , they will likely become boring or predictable . Even if a new secret plan is released , it launch the risk of being miserable calibre ( in comparing to its predecessors , that is ) if Rockstar does n’t spend an adequate amount of clock time on it . The company carry almost a decade between thefirst and secondRed Dead Redemptiongames , so to make an exclusively novel championship for next - gen consoles would probably take an equal amount of fourth dimension , if not even more .
These days , Rockstar tend to take its time when releasing games . Other franchise – likeAssassin ’s Creed – have compromise on quality and hemipterous insect fixes in the yesteryear in ordination to release their games in a well-timed manner , and to thus financially profit off of their popularity in the moment . TheRed Dead Redemptionseriesis so highly acclaimed because of the level of detail Rockstar set up into the subject reality surround , and if a raw claim was rushed , it could compromise their tone . Even more , if Rockstar were to turn aRed Dead Redemption 3that did n’t match its predecessors in terms of functionality or plate , it would be in all likelihood seen as a huge blow to the dealership ’s reputation .
Perhaps the biggest reason that Rockstar should say no to aRed Dead Redemption 3is that there ’s not much more they can do with the story . The latest secret plan acted as a prequel to the original , so it would feel repetitive to make a new game based on events that happened before the second . Similarly , all the independent characters have been killed off in the enfranchisement – Arthur , John , Dutch , and Bill . TheVan der Linde gangdoesn’t exist anymore , so the plot ’s writers would have to make an all new gang and characters . However , if all the characters are dissimilar , then a third game would n’t feel like it truly fit in with the first two . Even more , it may be hard for player to warm up to fresh outlaws when they ’ll always be compare them to previous ones , especially after all the distinct quality inRed Dead Redemption 2 . Creating aRed Dead Redemption 3would be a gamble , and if not done justly it could in earnest harm the franchise .
NEXT : How Red Dead Redemption 2 Remembers Arthur Morgan Post - Story
