Twilight
While none of theTwilightmovies were critical Darling , the receipt of the series still sour as the sequels endure on — and there were valid reason for each failure ’s underperformance . TheTwilightmovies were love by impassioned followers of author Stephenie Meyers ’ bestselling paranormal Latinian language saga . However , despite their success at the box office , theTwilightfranchise never managed to win over commentator who for the most part found the tween phenomenon to be ludicrously moody and ego - serious , not to mention deep problematical in its themes and depiction of Latinian language .
Director Catherine Hardwicke ’s adaptation of the first novel in the saga stuck tight to the source material despiteTwilight ’s earlier original script draft contradictinga bunch of Meyers ’ characterization . This resulted in many critics callingTwilighta gloomy , moody outing that would mostly attract only to fans of the Good Book . However , 2009’sNew Moonsoon proved that the franchise could be even more parochial , with unimpressed critic say that even those conversant with the books would fail to witness much worth praising in the saga ’s soph effort .
connect : Why Twilight Only Has One Female Shapeshifter
However , the vital fortunes of theTwilightsaga improved jolly with the release of 2010’sEclipse . The more action - forward sequel was seen as a step up fromNew Moon , although director David Slade ’s film had issues of its own behind the scenes . Finally , the two - partBreaking Dawnprovided an underwhelming ending to the series , with most critics relieved to be rid of the franchise by the timeBreaking Dawn Part II ’s infamous fake - out endingconcluded . While the originalTwilightwasn’t critically dear , in retrospect , the original movie was among the saga ’s better - review sashay . This has incite many to require what go wrong with each of the sequel and whether their missteps might have been avoided .
What Twilight Got Right
Although Hardwicke ’s original adjustment was almost too close to the source textile , its grunge - influenced filming , the chronicle ’s bestow execution mystery subplot , and the killer soundtrack stopped it from being a entirely teens - only affair . Twilightwas still firmly aim at the target demographic of the original novel and have plenty of mopey teenage brooding , but a soundtrack of genuinely enceinte music and Hardwicke ’s patrician - tinged lensing ensured that these sequences at least count and sounded superb . Add inTwilight ’s murder closed book subplot(which was n’t present in the original novel and gives the story some much - take non - amorous tensity ) , and reviewers were left with a darker , quicker - pace news report than the original novel . As a upshot , Twilight ’s reviews were among the good in the series , partially because no later director was ease up as much creative freedom with the dealership as Hardwicke .
Where New Moon Went Wrong
With the studio now aware thatTwilightwas a guaranteed money - make machine , it was imperative that the movie ’s first continuation jettison anything resembling danger . Thus , Hardwicke was replaced by Chris Weitz , who filled the 2009 subsequence with broad humor , less dispute , and a bright , blander ocular aesthetic . loosely viewed as theweakestTwilightmovie , New Moonlightened the enfranchisement ’s tone and opted for a warm color palette that made the difference of opinion - free tale too slight to corroborate its laggy runtime . Whether or not they were intimate with the source novels , noNew Moonviewers bought that Edward would actually end up dying by suicide , meaning his plot line amounted to a narrative empty menace . Not only that , the Edward vs. Jacob erotic love triangle did n’t pay off until the next movie , leavingNew Moonwith almost no taradiddle to evidence and a foresightful runtime to make full with its non - plot .
Where Eclipse Went Wrong
2010’sEclipseis well themost underestimate movie in theTwilightseries , a big betterment on the original novel and a major step up fromNew Moon ’s version . However , evenEclipsehad its issues , commence with an unneeded decision to replace one ofTwilight ’s original trio of villains . Recasting Victoria in a serial where there are only a handful of major villain was unnecessary and impossible to ignore , particularly when her associate Laurent was still diddle by the same actor as before only one moving-picture show sooner . Meanwhile , when it came to story structure , Eclipsehad another , expectant issue . Keeping Jacob , Edward , and Bella far from the finis ’s natural action — while book - accurate — sapped the narrative ’s end of its potential wallop . WhileTwilightwas right to cut the character deathsthat were added to its first playscript draft , this sequel , in particular , stuck too closely to the stories outlined by the source novels . As a result , viewers were subject to the central trio freezing on a remote mountaintop for much of the moving-picture show ’s runtime in the saga ’s least engaging subplot .
relate : Twilight : Marcus ’s Dark Backstory Explained
Where Breaking Dawn Part 1 Went Wrong
WhileBreaking Dawn Part 1and2were left in unspoilt hands when the studio hired blockbuster journeyman Bill Condon to helm both franchise picnic , the first of the two suffered from a serious deficiency of plot . Like most franchises that skewer their final movie in two , Twilightsimply did not have enough story to substantiate two two - hour movies . By split up the story of Meyers ’ novel into two character , Breaking Dawn Part 1ended up with almost no plot to cover . Bella’sTwilightvampire turnwas solid , gruesome , and genuinely compelling , but it occurred in the movie ’s final scene . Meanwhile , Edward and Bella ’s wedding was a sugared moment but arrived in the movie ’s opening scenes .
Other than Edward refusing to have sex with Bella after their wedding party ( a storyline that is voiceless to take seriously ) , the continuation had almost no tarradiddle and functions only to set up the next outing . break away Dawn Part 1might have been able-bodied to get away with this if the movie had a shorter runtime , but instead , the central battle of the megahit sum of money to Edward attempting to deflect his St. Bridget with tennis lessons and surfing while she valorously try out to drag the bloodsucker into the marital bed . The motion-picture show run like a subplot fromForgetting Sarah Marshalland is arguably the silliest in the series as a solution .
Where Breaking Dawn Part 2 Went Wrong
The conclusion of the saga ( at least untilStephenie Meyer drop a line anotherTwilightnovel),Breaking Dawn Part 2 ’s big problem is one that will involve not be pointed out for most lovers of the dealership . There were plenty of trip-up when it come to the last movie in the enfranchisement , from CGI Renesmee ’s creepy , unearthly valley appearance to the truncate use of the Volturi . However , the imitation - out terminate ofBreaking Dawn Part 2was a major failure for many viewers , as the aspect staged the striking struggle that the dealership was seemingly set up for eld only to then undo its events immediately . It was a weak and tough to excuse decoy - and - switch that even long - timeTwilightfans took issue with , promptly becoming the most notorious of the many trouble that the franchise ’s sequel meet .
More : The Twilight Role Vanessa Hudgens Almost Played
