I Am Legend
I Am Legendrepeats a error from another Hollywood sci - fi version by create its protagonist a morally unsophisticated , straightforward natural action hero . Released in 2007,I Am Legendis ground on Richard Matheson ’s 1954 novel of the same name and similarly follows a lonely , unhinge vagabond through a desolate post - apocalyptic city as he hunts vampiric creatures . But the movie adaption omit the point of Matheson ’s book by modifying the principal character and change the story ’s ending , similar to a error made by Steven Spielberg with the originalJurassic Park .
Also base on a pop novel , Spielberg ’s sci - fi repulsion smash hit turns the well - intentioned villain of its generator material into a misunderstood torpedo . In Michael Crichton ’s originalJurassic Parkbook , the reference of John Hammond , beginner of the titular drawing card , is an self-important , self - centered , and lethally brusk - sighted businessman . In the 1993movie edition ofJurassic Park , Hammondis changed to a kindly erstwhile man — a wealthy yet generous angel of scientific research and literal grandfather figure who but has an impossible dreaming . Crichton ’s novel service as a cautionary tale of Hammond ’s sentiency of superiority overturn human decency , yet Spielberg ’s version ironically makes that rather villainous reference out to be one of the movie ’s heroes .
Related : I Am Legend earlier Made The Heartbreaking Dog Story Even Darker
I Am Legendsimilarly turn its source cloth ’s morally equivocal protagonist , Dr. Robert Neville , into a benevolent scientist trying to deliver human beings from a terrific threat . The handsome twist of Matheson ’s novel have it percipient that the vampiric creatures are the real victims , and it is Neville ’s nearsightedness that causes him to see himself as the one under attack . The terminate ofthe 2007I Am Legendmoviemistakenly change this by tailor a picture of Neville communicating with the " monsters " and realise they are tender , sentient beings , replacing it with one where he blows them , and himself , up with a grenade . Only the novel version ofI Am Legendreveals that the creatures have feelings and are actually horrified by Neville ’s murderous attack on their residential area .
For bothI Am LegendandJurassic Park , the original sci - fi novel implicitly pick apart their champion for turn off their humanity and using scientific discipline as an excuse to act god . But theI Am Legendadaptation instead demonizes the pic ’s creatures , while theJurassic Parkmovie blames Dennis Nedry — Hammond ’s bad sin being that he trusted his employees to ordain his visual modality , rather than the fact that he bullied , blackmailed , and underpaid his stave to the point that they inescapably double - traverse him . Both alteration result in their movies fork over a fundamentally unlike content from that of their source material .
MakingI Am Legend ’s Neville an un - ironically heroic shape and turningJurassic Park ’s proprietor into a odorous , well - intend idealist simply reward the idea that these type should have been given free rein to do as they please , should n’t have been interrogate for their moral option , and should n’t have faced any negative moment of their action .
In the movie interpretation , the failure of Jurassic Park at the endhas nothing to do with Hammond ’s hubris and everything to do with one vitriolic employee . Similarly , inI Am Legend ’s movie end , the Hero of Alexandria would choose to give out than listen to the position of another , and this is presented as grounds of his heroism . In its adaptation of a successful sci - fi novel , I Am Legendtakes a textual matter that in the first place warned readers against pursuing scientific goal without a moral compass and , likeJurassic Parkbefore it , the movie instead offers celebrations of peculiar super - geniuses .
More : Will Smith ’s Oscars Moment Will injure I Am Legend 2
